On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 12:08:58PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:26:59AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange(a)redhat.com>
>
> If we are comparing storage pools we must skip comparing with
> ourself, so that re-defining an existing pool works
>
> * conf/storage_conf.c: Skip self when comparing
> ---
> src/conf/storage_conf.c | 4 ++++
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/conf/storage_conf.c b/src/conf/storage_conf.c
> index e893b2d..eb39198 100644
> --- a/src/conf/storage_conf.c
> +++ b/src/conf/storage_conf.c
> @@ -1730,6 +1730,10 @@ int
virStoragePoolSourceFindDuplicate(virStoragePoolObjListPtr pools,
> if (def->type != pool->def->type)
> continue;
>
> + /* Don't mach against ourself if re-defining existing pool ! */
> + if (STREQ(pool->def->name, def->name))
> + continue;
> +
> virStoragePoolObjLock(pool);
>
> switch (pool->def->type) {
This one didn't get applied yet but it seems to fix some libvirt-tck
failures. Is this just an omission?
Opps, forgot to push it. Done now
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|