
28 Jan
2014
28 Jan
'14
8:28 a.m.
Paul Eggert wrote:
On 01/27/2014 01:03 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
I'd like some feedback from the gnulib community if favoring $(SED) is the right thing to do, or if I should just rewrite libvirt's rules to stick to portable sed constructs.
My kneejerk reaction is that we'd probably have fewer problems using '$(SED)' everywhere in a makefile, rather than using '$(SED)' some places and 'sed' in others, because it'd be one less 'sed' implementation to worry about.
Yes, that was the idea. That's why I replaced all the usage of 'sed' even though not all of them are non-portable, as Eric pointed. For sure, using portable regexps is better way, but I don't know how much of effort that would be. Roman Bogorodskiy