Re: [Libvir] The problem of the definition of tuning informations

Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:00:10PM -0600, Ryan Harper wrote: >> I don't have any objection to separating "tuning" information as long as >> we have the ability to merge permanent domain parameters with its >> "tuning" information prior to domain construction. >> > > My point is that you don't need the tuning informations to create the > domain, if you need them it's not tuning. Well said Daniel - a simple point I was missing. I repeal my objection [1].