On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 14:46:12 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 14:47:36 +0800 Osier Yang <jyang@redhat.com> wrote:
Yes, I think it's better. Should I prepare patches ? or you'll do ?
Let's see other guys's opinions before doing it, :)
A patch (full change version) is here. maybe good input for discussion.
==
From 0bceb6f204f7551c701d9f60fecd82562b38bd50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 14:46:08 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] Rename swap_hard_limit as memswap_hard_limit
This patch affects qemu and lxc, using memory cgroup.
Linux's memory cgroup's memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes is a limit for memory+swap, not for swap. (This behavior is for avoiding bad influence for global vmscan and never disturb kswapd behavior by user's setting.)
Argh, thats me... :( Thanks for the patch Kame. Reviewed-by: "Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Regards, Nikunj