9 May
2012
9 May
'12
1:25 p.m.
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@redhat.com> wrote:
). I think it would be nicer to be consistent with that for preallocation and not return an error either in this case.
I am not convinced this is the right thing to do. Perhaps sparse allocation, or not, does not make a big difference, but prealloc does. So silently ignoring the request is going to cause more trouble. If it's specified, I think it should be respected. -- Marc-André Lureau