Re: [libvirt] [PATCH libvirt 2/2] storage: learn to create qcow2 with preallocation
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau(a)redhat.com> wrote:
). I think it would be nicer to be consistent
with that for preallocation and not return an error either in this case.
I am not convinced this is the right thing to do. Perhaps sparse
allocation, or not, does not make a big difference, but prealloc does.
So silently ignoring the request is going to cause more trouble. If
it's specified, I think it should be respected.
--
Marc-André Lureau