On 02/12/2013 07:24 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/12/2013 01:15 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
> This makes it simpler to include the necessary system security driver
> libraries for a particular system. For this patch, several existing
> conditional sections from the Makfile were replaced; I'll later be
> adding SECDRIVER_LIBS to libvirt_util_la_LIBADD, because vircommand.c
> will be calling a function from $securitylib.
> ---
> Change from V1:
> * initialize SECDRIVER_LIBS to empty
> * allow both WITH_SECDRIVER_SELINUX and WITH_SECDRIVER_APPARMOR in the same build
Do you have a handy pointer for how to get apparmor headers installed
for building with both libraries on Fedora?
No idea. I just learned from Dan that it was at least theoretically
possible, and am counting on debian/ubuntu people to actually test this
bit, since I don't have any system that uses AppArmor.