On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 07:13:24PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 13:54 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 03/20/2018 01:00 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
Macros in RPMs are expanded before line continuations, so when we write
%systemd_preun foo \ bar
What happens is that it expands to
if [ $1 -eq 0 ] ; then # Package removal, not upgrade systemctl --no-reload disable --now foo \ > /dev/null 2>&1 || : fi bar
which is obviously complete garbage and not what we expected. It is simply not safe to ever use line continuations in combination with macros.
Introduced in commit bffdd6c3034164127b1543ffd2e9ed599baf4838, present in released libvirt-4.1.0.
This is going to be problematic for any rpm-based distro that has a 4.1.0 rpm, e.g. Fedora rawhide and F28 - if someone has updated to the broken rpm, they won't be able to get rid of it with a plain update, and dnf has no command that passes through the necessary --nopreun command to rpm. Instead, they'll need to run rpm manually - "rpm --nopreun blah blah".
If there is already a 4.1.0-maint branch, we should pull this patch back to there, and think about how to notify the poor F28/rawhide users of their predicament (hopefully there aren't too many, as F28 isn't yet released)
IIUC Fedora and other distributions each have their own spec file which, while probably derived from and for the most part identical to the upstream one, is actually maintained separately.
No that is not the case. On every release I synchronize the libvirt upstream spec into the Fedora spec. The only thing different about Fedora spec is that it has changelog entries. That's why we go to the trouble of making sure conditionals cope with multiple distros in our upstream spec. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|