On 04/26/2012 02:11 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 04/26/2012 03:50 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816662 pointed out
>> that attempting 'virsh blockpull' on an offline domain gave a
>> misleading error message about qemu lacking support for the
>> operation, even when qemu was specifically updated to support it.
>> The real problem is that we have several capabilities that are
>> only determined when starting a domain, and therefore are still
>> clear when first working with an inactive domain (namely, any
>> capability set by qemuMonitorJSONCheckCommands).
>> @@ -12637,6 +12643,12 @@ qemuDomainPMSuspendForDuration(virDomainPtr dom,
>>
>> priv = vm->privateData;
>>
>> + if (!virDomainObjIsActive(vm)) {
>> + qemuReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_INVALID,
>> + "%s", _("domain is not running"));
>> + goto endjob;
>> + }
>> +
> Nit, you could move this above the priv =. Neither endjob nor cleanup
> need this priv.
> But 'goto endjob' is wrong (replace with 'goto cleanup'),
D'oh - too much copy-and-paste! You're obviously right (and this is why
we do code review).
Pushed with the two labels fixed, per your ACK on IRC.
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library