On 23/03/16 08:32, Peter Xu wrote:
diff --git a/target-arm/kvm.c b/target-arm/kvm.c
index 969ab0b..0a7f9a6 100644
--- a/target-arm/kvm.c
+++ b/target-arm/kvm.c
@@ -62,13 +62,17 @@ bool kvm_arm_create_scratch_host_vcpu(const uint32_t *cpus_to_try,
goto err;
}
+ if (!init) {
+ goto finish;
+ }
+
ret = ioctl(vmfd, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, init);
if (ret >= 0) {
ret = ioctl(cpufd, KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT, init);
if (ret < 0) {
goto err;
}
- } else {
+ } else if (cpus_to_try) {
/* Old kernel which doesn't know about the
* PREFERRED_TARGET ioctl: we know it will only support
* creating one kind of guest CPU which is its preferred
@@ -85,8 +89,12 @@ bool kvm_arm_create_scratch_host_vcpu(const uint32_t *cpus_to_try,
if (ret < 0) {
goto err;
}
+ } else {
+ /* Not providing cpus_to_try, do nothing. */
+ ;
I think it's probably not the best idea to skip CPU initialization here.
I'd rather raise an error in such case. If we supplied non-NULL init
argument then we need VCPU been initialized, don't we? If we pass NULL
as init then we actually skip this code.
Kind regards,
Sergey
}
+finish:
fdarray[0] = kvmfd;
fdarray[1] = vmfd;
fdarray[2] = cpufd;