11 Apr
2012
11 Apr
'12
6:32 p.m.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 05:19:33PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
The concept of 'default usb controllers' seems very policy based to me & different hypervisors will have different views of this.
So IMHO we should not add this API
I'm fine with dropping the patch. My feeling was that this API had a bit too much policy in it, but that it can be quite helpful. I guess now I have to replace it with actual API documentation for GVirConfigDomainControllerUsb so that people know they should not copy&paste all of what is done in the test program. Christophe