Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar(a)redhat.com>
---
src/cpu/cpu_map.xml | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml b/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml
index b3d7d14..1114c0c 100644
--- a/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml
+++ b/src/cpu/cpu_map.xml
@@ -552,10 +552,31 @@
</model>
<model name='cpu64-rhel5'>
- <model name='kvm32'/>
+ <feature name='apic'/>
+ <feature name='clflush'/>
+ <feature name='cmov'/>
+ <feature name='cx8'/>
+ <feature name='de'/>
+ <feature name='fpu'/>
+ <feature name='fxsr'/>
<feature name='lm'/>
+ <feature name='mca'/>
+ <feature name='mce'/>
+ <feature name='mmx'/>
+ <feature name='msr'/>
+ <feature name='mtrr'/>
<feature name='nx'/>
+ <feature name='pae'/>
+ <feature name='pat'/>
+ <feature name='pge'/>
+ <feature name='pni'/>
+ <feature name='pse'/>
+ <feature name='pse36'/>
+ <feature name='sep'/>
+ <feature name='sse'/>
+ <feature name='sse2'/>
<feature name='syscall'/>
+ <feature name='tsc'/>
</model>
<model name='cpu64-rhel6'>
--
2.4.4