On 09/30/2016 12:02 PM, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> Commit 21373feb added support for primary virtio-vga device but it was
> checking for virtio-gpu. Let's check for existence of virtio-vga if we
> want to use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 2 ++
> src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h | 1 +
> tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.4.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
> tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.5.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
> tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.6.0.ppc64le.xml | 1 +
> tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.6.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
> tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.7.0.x86_64.xml | 1 +
> 7 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
It seems this is related to your patch 6 changes or what I said should
be split. There's something funky there and I think everything should be
kept "closer" if not merged together. It could get ugly, but getting it
all done and explained at once would be best IMO.
It seems what you're indicating is that the two shouldn't have been
combined into one CAP. Still that seems to be counter intuitive to the
first part of this series which was merging caps. It's a bit confusing
to say the least ;-)!
The thing is that there is a difference in QXL video and virtio video.
If QXL video device is compiled in QEMU there are always both models
*qxl-vga* and *qxl*. But this is not the same as for virtio video.
It is currently represented by three different models *virtio-gpu-device*,
*virtio-gpu-pci* and *virtio-vga*. The first two models are tied together
and if virtio video devices is compiled in they both exist. However,
the *virtio-vga* model doesn't have to exist on some architectures even if
the first two models exist. So we cannot group all three together.
Pavel
Also you'll have a merge to handle with this patch...
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
> index 5449b07..55e5527 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c
> @@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ VIR_ENUM_IMPL(virQEMUCaps, QEMU_CAPS_LAST,
> "query-hotpluggable-cpus",
>
> "virtio-net.rx_queue_size", /* 235 */
> + "virtio-vga",
> );
>
>
> @@ -1570,6 +1571,7 @@ struct virQEMUCapsStringFlags virQEMUCapsObjectTypes[] = {
> { "virtio-net-device", QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_VIRTIO_NET },
> { "virtio-gpu-pci", QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_VIRTIO_GPU },
> { "virtio-gpu-device", QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_VIRTIO_GPU },
> + { "virtio-vga", QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_VIRTIO_VGA },
> { "virtio-keyboard-device", QEMU_CAPS_VIRTIO_KEYBOARD },
> { "virtio-keyboard-pci", QEMU_CAPS_VIRTIO_KEYBOARD },
> { "virtio-mouse-device", QEMU_CAPS_VIRTIO_MOUSE },
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h
> index 1766aa6..b2c8c9f 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h
> @@ -378,6 +378,7 @@ typedef enum {
>
> /* 235 */
> QEMU_CAPS_VIRTIO_NET_RX_QUEUE_SIZE, /* virtio-net-*.rx_queue_size */
> + QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_VIRTIO_VGA, /* virtio-vga */
/* -device virtio-vga */
Before an ACK - I'll be interested to understand the relationship w/
patch 6 and a bit of the history/reasoning for a separate cap
(especially in light of combining other caps).
John
>
> QEMU_CAPS_LAST /* this must always be the last item */
> } virQEMUCapsFlags;
> diff --git a/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.4.0.x86_64.xml
b/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.4.0.x86_64.xml
> index 8d53988..17bd4bb 100644
> --- a/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.4.0.x86_64.xml
> +++ b/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.4.0.x86_64.xml
> @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@
> <flag name='intel-iommu'/>
> <flag name='smm'/>
> <flag name='virtio-pci-disable-legacy'/>
> + <flag name='virtio-vga'/>
> <version>2004000</version>
> <kvmVersion>0</kvmVersion>
> <package></package>
> diff --git a/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.5.0.x86_64.xml
b/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.5.0.x86_64.xml
> index a4f5663..fe058d9 100644
> --- a/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.5.0.x86_64.xml
> +++ b/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.5.0.x86_64.xml
> @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@
> <flag name='intel-iommu'/>
> <flag name='smm'/>
> <flag name='virtio-pci-disable-legacy'/>
> + <flag name='virtio-vga'/>
> <version>2005000</version>
> <kvmVersion>0</kvmVersion>
> <package></package>
> diff --git a/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.6.0.ppc64le.xml
b/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.6.0.ppc64le.xml
> index 60f5392..e63e7c1 100644
> --- a/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.6.0.ppc64le.xml
> +++ b/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.6.0.ppc64le.xml
> @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@
> <flag name='display'/>
> <flag name='smm'/>
> <flag name='virtio-pci-disable-legacy'/>
> + <flag name='virtio-vga'/>
> <version>2005094</version>
> <kvmVersion>0</kvmVersion>
> <package></package>
> diff --git a/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.6.0.x86_64.xml
b/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.6.0.x86_64.xml
> index 50506ba..5f93d59 100644
> --- a/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.6.0.x86_64.xml
> +++ b/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.6.0.x86_64.xml
> @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@
> <flag name='intel-iommu'/>
> <flag name='smm'/>
> <flag name='virtio-pci-disable-legacy'/>
> + <flag name='virtio-vga'/>
> <version>2006000</version>
> <kvmVersion>0</kvmVersion>
> <package></package>
> diff --git a/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.7.0.x86_64.xml
b/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.7.0.x86_64.xml
> index b0b4ab1..dc11677 100644
> --- a/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.7.0.x86_64.xml
> +++ b/tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.7.0.x86_64.xml
> @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@
> <flag name='smm'/>
> <flag name='virtio-pci-disable-legacy'/>
> <flag name='query-hotpluggable-cpus'/>
> + <flag name='virtio-vga'/>
> <version>2007000</version>
> <kvmVersion>0</kvmVersion>
> <package> (v2.7.0)</package>
>
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list