On 12/20/2013 11:40 AM, Reco wrote:
You still haven't answered my query from an earlier version: we prefer to list a legal name in the authorship of git commits (after all, copyleft licenses work _because_ of copyright law, but the law prefers working with full names rather than nicknames). Is there something that I should list you as rather than just "Reco"?
As far as I'm concerned, this bug was fixed by (in alphabet order):
Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
/me merely pushed buttons on the keyboard and spammed this maillist.
Hopefully this eliminates current and future legal issues.
And 'Reco' is the alias as good as any.
Fair enough. Then since I'm rewriting a good chunk of the patch anyways, I'll reassign authorship to myself and leave a line of credit to you - giving credit is much looser than claiming authorship. v5 coming up shortly, and I'll wait for your response on that thread to ensure that what I did was okay. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org