On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 02:40:40PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > By specifying <vendor> element in CPU requirements a
guest can be
> > restricted to run only on CPUs by a given vendor. Host CPU vendor is
> > also specified in capabilities XML.
> >
> > The vendor is checked when migrating a guest but it's not forced, i.e.,
> > a guest configured without <vendor> element can be freely migrated.
...
> > src/cpu/cpu_map.xml | 6 +
>
> Why did you add <vendor> tags to several of the models there? Does qemu
> (-no-kvm) have any problem emulating athlon on an Intel host?
Honestly, I don't know if qemu has any problems emulating them but it doesn't
really matter. The <vendor> emelement in cpu_map.xml is used when libvirt
decides what model should be used for describing host CPU.
> And how about adding policy='disable' attribute, so that I can ask
> virConnectCompareCPU to ignore this particular incompatibility, as I do
> with <feature> items?
Just don't use <vendor> tag in your XML.
In other words, if you specify <vendor> in domain XML (or it's cpu fragment
used by virConnectCompareCPU) and your host CPU is made by different vendor,
the CPUs won't match. If you don't specify <vendor>, you don't care
about the
vendor and neither does libvirt.
I hope it's more clear now.
I wanted to (ab)use virConnectCompareCPU to roughly tell a certain cpu
model (say athlon) can be emulated on my host. I now see that this is not
going to happen, and I'll have to do my own feature set comparison.
Thanks,
Dan.