man, 24 03 2008 kl. 19:00 +0000, skrev Daniel P. Berrange:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:52:41AM +0100, Mads Chr. Olesen wrote:
> Anything further I can do to help get this patch commited?
>
> I have been running with it, without problems across restarts, etc.,
for
> a couple of weeks now.
I still don't see where the routing rules are defined / take place
with this setup. There must be rules somewhere specifying the routing
for the subnet 78.47.YYY.YYY/30, but its not being done in your
patchset AFAICT
Do you mean entries in the routing table, or?
This is my routing table:
$ route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
78.47.YYY.YYY 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 U 0 0 0 virsubnetbr0
85.10.XXX.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 0 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 85.10.XXX.1 0.0.0.0 UG 100 0 0 eth0
The entry for virsubnetbr0 is setup automatically, by the definition in
the XML-file:
<ip address="78.47.YYY.YYY" netmask="255.255.255.248" />
--
Mads Chr. Olesen <shiyee(a)shiyee.dk>
shiyee.dk