Jiri Denemark wrote:
...
> @@ -954,6 +954,9 @@ x86Decode(virCPUDefPtr cpu,
> if (data == NULL || (map = x86LoadMap()) == NULL)
> return -1;
>
> + if (models == NULL && nmodels != 0)
> + return -1;
> +
Hmm, this check introduces a possible memory leak, as it exists the function
without freeing map. We could just move the check at the beginning of the
function but since this is a private architecture specific implementation for
cpuDecode, I'd rather move the check one level up to the arch independent
entry point. A patch for that is attached.
Subject: [PATCH] Move models/nmodels mismatch checking one level up
Hi Jirka,
Good catch.
That's a fine change: plugs a leak and improves the higher-level interface.
Thank you.