On 08/12/2016 09:33 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
Both cpuCompare* APIs are renamed to virCPUCompare*. And they should
now
work for any guest CPU definition, i.e., even for host-passthrough
(trivial) and host-model CPUs. The implementation in x86 driver is
enhanced to provide a hint about -noTSX Broadwell and Haswell models
when appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar(a)redhat.com>
---
src/cpu/cpu.c | 37 ++++++++++++---------
src/cpu/cpu.h | 21 ++++++------
src/cpu/cpu_arm.c | 8 ++---
src/cpu/cpu_ppc64.c | 15 +++++++--
src/cpu/cpu_x86.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
src/libvirt_private.syms | 4 +--
src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 14 ++------
tests/cputest.c | 4 +--
8 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu.c b/src/cpu/cpu.c
index d6b0372..4ea192c 100644
--- a/src/cpu/cpu.c
+++ b/src/cpu/cpu.c
@@ -91,8 +91,9 @@ cpuGetSubDriverByName(const char *name)
/**
- * cpuCompareXML:
+ * virCPUCompareXML:
*
+ * @arch: CPU architecture
* @host: host CPU definition
* @xml: XML description of either guest or host CPU to be compared with @host
Existing, @failIncompatible description is missing
*
@@ -104,25 +105,26 @@ cpuGetSubDriverByName(const char *name)
* the @host CPU.
*/
virCPUCompareResult
-cpuCompareXML(virCPUDefPtr host,
- const char *xml,
- bool failIncompatible)
+virCPUCompareXML(virArch arch,
+ virCPUDefPtr host,
+ const char *xml,
+ bool failIncompatible)
{
xmlDocPtr doc = NULL;
xmlXPathContextPtr ctxt = NULL;
virCPUDefPtr cpu = NULL;
virCPUCompareResult ret = VIR_CPU_COMPARE_ERROR;
- VIR_DEBUG("host=%p, xml=%s", host, NULLSTR(xml));
+ VIR_DEBUG("arch=%s, host=%p, xml=%s",
+ virArchToString(arch), host, NULLSTR(xml));
The prototype changed such that 'host' and 'xml' could be passed as NULL
without a compiler complaint (ok a static analysis complaint). Was that
by design?
if (!(doc = virXMLParseStringCtxt(xml, _("(CPU_definition)"), &ctxt)))
Having xml as NULL probably doesn't work well here.
goto cleanup;
- cpu = virCPUDefParseXML(ctxt->node, ctxt, VIR_CPU_TYPE_AUTO);
- if (cpu == NULL)
+ if (!(cpu = virCPUDefParseXML(ctxt->node, ctxt, VIR_CPU_TYPE_AUTO)))
goto cleanup;
- ret = cpuCompare(host, cpu, failIncompatible);
+ ret = virCPUCompare(arch, host, cpu, failIncompatible);
Allowing host to be NULL will cause failure in PPC and X86 which perhaps
is expected.
cleanup:
virCPUDefFree(cpu);
@@ -134,8 +136,9 @@ cpuCompareXML(virCPUDefPtr host,
/**
- * cpuCompare:
+ * virCPUCompare:
*
+ * @arch: CPU architecture
* @host: host CPU definition
* @cpu: either guest or host CPU to be compared with @host
*
@@ -147,21 +150,23 @@ cpuCompareXML(virCPUDefPtr host,
* the @host CPU.
*/
virCPUCompareResult
-cpuCompare(virCPUDefPtr host,
- virCPUDefPtr cpu,
- bool failIncompatible)
+virCPUCompare(virArch arch,
+ virCPUDefPtr host,
+ virCPUDefPtr cpu,
+ bool failIncompatible)
{
struct cpuArchDriver *driver;
- VIR_DEBUG("host=%p, cpu=%p", host, cpu);
+ VIR_DEBUG("arch=%s, host=%p, cpu=%p",
+ virArchToString(arch), host, cpu);
- if ((driver = cpuGetSubDriver(host->arch)) == NULL)
+ if (!(driver = cpuGetSubDriver(arch)))
return VIR_CPU_COMPARE_ERROR;
- if (driver->compare == NULL) {
+ if (!driver->compare) {
virReportError(VIR_ERR_NO_SUPPORT,
_("cannot compare CPUs of %s architecture"),
- virArchToString(host->arch));
+ virArchToString(arch));
return VIR_CPU_COMPARE_ERROR;
}
diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu.h b/src/cpu/cpu.h
index 77ccb38..0e81e91 100644
--- a/src/cpu/cpu.h
+++ b/src/cpu/cpu.h
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ struct _virCPUData {
typedef virCPUCompareResult
-(*cpuArchCompare) (virCPUDefPtr host,
+(*virCPUArchCompare)(virCPUDefPtr host,
virCPUDefPtr cpu,
bool failIncompatible);
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ struct cpuArchDriver {
const char *name;
const virArch *arch;
unsigned int narch;
- cpuArchCompare compare;
+ virCPUArchCompare compare;
cpuArchDecode decode;
cpuArchEncode encode;
cpuArchDataFree free;
@@ -134,16 +134,17 @@ struct cpuArchDriver {
virCPUCompareResult
-cpuCompareXML(virCPUDefPtr host,
- const char *xml,
- bool failIncompatible)
- ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(1) ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(2);
Was removing NONNULL by design? I think it needs to be replaced for xml
at least.
+virCPUCompareXML(virArch arch,
+ virCPUDefPtr host,
+ const char *xml,
+ bool failIncompatible);
virCPUCompareResult
-cpuCompare (virCPUDefPtr host,
- virCPUDefPtr cpu,
- bool failIncompatible)
- ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(1) ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(2);
+virCPUCompare(virArch arch,
+ virCPUDefPtr host,
+ virCPUDefPtr cpu,
+ bool failIncompatible)
+ ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL(3);
int
cpuDecode (virCPUDefPtr cpu,
diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu_arm.c b/src/cpu/cpu_arm.c
index 3b68d83..2cef5bc 100644
--- a/src/cpu/cpu_arm.c
+++ b/src/cpu/cpu_arm.c
@@ -112,9 +112,9 @@ armBaseline(virCPUDefPtr *cpus,
}
static virCPUCompareResult
-armCompare(virCPUDefPtr host ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
- virCPUDefPtr cpu ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
- bool failMessages ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
+virCPUarmCompare(virCPUDefPtr host ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+ virCPUDefPtr cpu ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+ bool failMessages ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
{
return VIR_CPU_COMPARE_IDENTICAL;
}
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ struct cpuArchDriver cpuDriverArm = {
.name = "arm",
.arch = archs,
.narch = ARRAY_CARDINALITY(archs),
- .compare = armCompare,
+ .compare = virCPUarmCompare,
.decode = NULL,
.encode = NULL,
.free = armDataFree,
diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu_ppc64.c b/src/cpu/cpu_ppc64.c
index 6f005e5..21ea0e1 100644
--- a/src/cpu/cpu_ppc64.c
+++ b/src/cpu/cpu_ppc64.c
@@ -634,13 +634,24 @@ ppc64Compute(virCPUDefPtr host,
}
static virCPUCompareResult
-ppc64DriverCompare(virCPUDefPtr host,
+virCPUppc64Compare(virCPUDefPtr host,
virCPUDefPtr cpu,
bool failIncompatible)
{
virCPUCompareResult ret;
char *message = NULL;
+ if (!host || !host->model) {
+ if (failIncompatible) {
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_CPU_INCOMPATIBLE, "%s",
+ _("unknown host CPU"));
+ } else {
+ VIR_WARN("unknown host CPU");
+ ret = VIR_CPU_COMPARE_INCOMPATIBLE;
+ }
+ return -1;
+ }
+
ret = ppc64Compute(host, cpu, NULL, &message);
if (failIncompatible && ret == VIR_CPU_COMPARE_INCOMPATIBLE) {
@@ -902,7 +913,7 @@ struct cpuArchDriver cpuDriverPPC64 = {
.name = "ppc64",
.arch = archs,
.narch = ARRAY_CARDINALITY(archs),
- .compare = ppc64DriverCompare,
+ .compare = virCPUppc64Compare,
.decode = ppc64DriverDecode,
.encode = NULL,
.free = ppc64DriverFree,
diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c b/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c
index 782c917..e0987c4 100644
--- a/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c
+++ b/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c
@@ -1057,7 +1057,8 @@ x86ModelFromCPU(const virCPUDef *cpu,
policy != -1)
return x86ModelNew();
- if (policy == VIR_CPU_FEATURE_REQUIRE || policy == -1) {
+ if (cpu->model &&
+ (policy == VIR_CPU_FEATURE_REQUIRE || policy == -1)) {
Shall I assume this related to the compare patch? or a fix as a result?
I assume it's related to changes in x86Compute and x86GuestData, but it
wasn't really clear from the commit message.
if (!(model = x86ModelFind(map, cpu->model))) {
virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
_("Unknown CPU model %s"), cpu->model);
[...]