On 07/03/2018 07:37 AM, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
...since maxWorkers=0 is only intended for virtlockd or virlogd
which
must not be multithreaded.
Signed-off-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay(a)linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy(a)linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjoern Walk <bwalk(a)linux.ibm.com>
---
src/util/virthreadpool.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
I think this is separable - this could be pushed regardless of the
outcome of patch2, right? Let me know - I can reduce the load the next
update based on patch2 comments.
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>
John