On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 05:52:01PM +0800, lhuang wrote:
On 05/21/2015 03:46 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 13:08:12 +0800, Luyao Huang wrote:
>>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223631
>>
>>When set a memory device in the xml, <sysinfo> in xml will be lost.
>>Because we forgot restore ctxt->node to the oldnode after parse memory
>>device, this will make the parse function after virDomainMemoryDefParseXML
>>cannot find a node they need when parse a full xml(virDomainDefParseXML).
>The commit message is really hard to read.
Okay, I will pay more attention about this. Maybe use the exist similar
commit message as an example will be a good choice.
>
>>Signed-off-by: Luyao Huang <lhuang(a)redhat.com>
>>---
>> src/conf/domain_conf.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>>diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
>>index bfdc94e..7ddc1ea 100644
>>--- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c
>>+++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
>>@@ -11828,6 +11828,7 @@ virDomainMemoryDefParseXML(xmlNodePtr memdevNode,
>> if (virDomainDeviceInfoParseXML(memdevNode, NULL, &def->info, flags)
< 0)
>> goto error;
>>+ ctxt->node = save;
>> return def;
>A test case is missing. The bugzilla link contains one so I'll add it.
Oh, I see, I hesitated about if need introduce a unit test when i fix this
issue.
Seems this is a rule about which case need a new test, isn't it? :)
Our rule is that any addition to the XML parser needs to have a test case
added - especially true if the addition is fixing a parsing bug :-)
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|