The two sides of a PTY can be referred to as primary and secondary
TTYs.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com>
---
src/util/virfile.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/util/virfile.c b/src/util/virfile.c
index 58dfd29304..1eebcf1b22 100644
--- a/src/util/virfile.c
+++ b/src/util/virfile.c
@@ -3127,20 +3127,20 @@ virFileBuildPath(const char *dir, const char *name, const char
*ext)
return path;
}
-/* Open a non-blocking master side of a pty. If ttyName is not NULL,
- * then populate it with the name of the slave. If rawmode is set,
- * also put the master side into raw mode before returning. */
+/* Open a non-blocking primary side of a pty. If ttyName is not NULL,
+ * then populate it with the name of the secondary peer. If rawmode is
+ * set, also put the primary side into raw mode before returning. */
#ifndef WIN32
int
-virFileOpenTty(int *ttymaster, char **ttyName, int rawmode)
+virFileOpenTty(int *ttyprimary, char **ttyName, int rawmode)
{
/* XXX A word of caution - on some platforms (Solaris and HP-UX),
- * additional ioctl() calls are needs after opening the slave
+ * additional ioctl() calls are needs after opening the secondary
* before it will cause isatty() to return true. Should we make
- * virFileOpenTty also return the opened slave fd, so the caller
+ * virFileOpenTty also return the opened secondary fd, so the caller
* doesn't have to worry about that mess? */
int ret = -1;
- int slave = -1;
+ int secondary = -1;
g_autofree char *name = NULL;
/* Unfortunately, we can't use the name argument of openpty, since
@@ -3148,31 +3148,31 @@ virFileOpenTty(int *ttymaster, char **ttyName, int rawmode)
* Likewise, we can't use the termios argument: we have to use
* read-modify-write since there is no portable way to initialize
* a struct termios without use of tcgetattr. */
- if (openpty(ttymaster, &slave, NULL, NULL, NULL) < 0)
+ if (openpty(ttyprimary, &secondary, NULL, NULL, NULL) < 0)
return -1;
/* What a shame that openpty cannot atomically set FD_CLOEXEC, but
* that using posix_openpt/grantpt/unlockpt/ptsname is not
* thread-safe, and that ptsname_r is not portable. */
- if (virSetNonBlock(*ttymaster) < 0 ||
- virSetCloseExec(*ttymaster) < 0)
+ if (virSetNonBlock(*ttyprimary) < 0 ||
+ virSetCloseExec(*ttyprimary) < 0)
goto cleanup;
- /* While Linux supports tcgetattr on either the master or the
- * slave, Solaris requires it to be on the slave. */
+ /* While Linux supports tcgetattr on either the primary or the
+ * secondary, Solaris requires it to be on the secondary. */
if (rawmode) {
struct termios ttyAttr;
- if (tcgetattr(slave, &ttyAttr) < 0)
+ if (tcgetattr(secondary, &ttyAttr) < 0)
goto cleanup;
cfmakeraw(&ttyAttr);
- if (tcsetattr(slave, TCSADRAIN, &ttyAttr) < 0)
+ if (tcsetattr(secondary, TCSADRAIN, &ttyAttr) < 0)
goto cleanup;
}
- /* ttyname_r on the slave is required by POSIX, while ptsname_r on
- * the master is a glibc extension, and the POSIX ptsname is not
+ /* ttyname_r on the secondary is required by POSIX, while ptsname_r on
+ * the primary is a glibc extension, and the POSIX ptsname is not
* thread-safe. Since openpty gave us both descriptors, guess
* which way we will determine the name? :) */
if (ttyName) {
@@ -3184,7 +3184,7 @@ virFileOpenTty(int *ttymaster, char **ttyName, int rawmode)
if (VIR_ALLOC_N(name, len) < 0)
goto cleanup;
- while ((rc = ttyname_r(slave, name, len)) == ERANGE) {
+ while ((rc = ttyname_r(secondary, name, len)) == ERANGE) {
if (VIR_RESIZE_N(name, len, len, len) < 0)
goto cleanup;
}
@@ -3200,14 +3200,14 @@ virFileOpenTty(int *ttymaster, char **ttyName, int rawmode)
cleanup:
if (ret != 0)
- VIR_FORCE_CLOSE(*ttymaster);
- VIR_FORCE_CLOSE(slave);
+ VIR_FORCE_CLOSE(*ttyprimary);
+ VIR_FORCE_CLOSE(secondary);
return ret;
}
#else /* WIN32 */
int
-virFileOpenTty(int *ttymaster G_GNUC_UNUSED,
+virFileOpenTty(int *ttyprimary G_GNUC_UNUSED,
char **ttyName G_GNUC_UNUSED,
int rawmode G_GNUC_UNUSED)
{
--
2.24.1