On 05/26/2015 08:05 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 08:04:25PM +0300, Maxim Nestratov wrote:
> 26.05.2015 18:01, Daniel P. Berrange пишет:
>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 05:57:41PM +0300, Maxim Nestratov wrote:
>>> It is necessary to have unpolluted screen when connecting to
>>> parallels driver via virsh.
>>> Otherwise a lot of unexpected output one will get on the console.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Maxim Nestratov <mnestratov(a)parallels.com>
>>> ---
>>> src/parallels/parallels_sdk.c | 3 +++
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/parallels/parallels_sdk.c b/src/parallels/parallels_sdk.c
>>> index 542e09e..b717ccf 100644
>>> --- a/src/parallels/parallels_sdk.c
>>> +++ b/src/parallels/parallels_sdk.c
>>> @@ -205,6 +205,9 @@ prlsdkInit(void)
>>> {
>>> PRL_RESULT ret;
>>> + /* Disable console output */
>>> + PrlApi_SwitchConsoleLogging(0);
>> Does the SDK logging ever produce anything that would be useful when
>> troubleshooting libvirt ?
>>
>> If so, you might be better to protect this with
>>
>> if (virGetEnvBlockSUID("LIBVIRT_PARALLELS_DEBUG") == NULL)
>> PrlApi_SwitchConsoleLogging(0);
>>
>> IOW, so people can do
>>
>> LIBVIR_PARALLELS_DEBUG=1 virsh ....
>>
>> if they need to see debugging info
>>
>> Regards,
>> Daniel
> Actually these debug output can be helpful but as soon as they are written
> to /var/log/parallels.log by default and duplicated to the console, I think
> it is not necessary to keep them in two places.
> Maybe it's worth mentioning this in commit message.
Ok, ack to your original patch then
I also agree with this patch, but I'll push it later because of code freeze.
Regards,
Daniel