On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 08:30:31AM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
hi all,
Thanks for helping reviewing for CAT support in the past days.
I writing this email to ask for the plan in libvirt support.
I think we’v discussed this early this year, and I’v proposed a patch set [1]. But don’t get merged because of some performance reason ?
Then I proposed a redesign RFC[2] based on Martin’s cache branch, thans Martin for the reviewing, I can address them but the question here is it depends on Martin’s `cache` branch, which if for exposing host’s `cache` information in capabilities xml, and it doesn’t get merged ether, I feel helpless.
Martin posted review comments on your latest patches just a couple of days ago, and you've not posted any newer version of the patches since then that address those comments.
As CAT is a key feature which would be required by many customers and especially the OpenStack integration.
Regardless of what/who needs a feature, we're not going to rush to merge patches if there are still outstanding issues that need fixing.
Would like to know the plan and get the some suggestions.
Carry on addressing the feedback provided & posting new versions of the patches for review. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|