On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 01:39:13PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 06:50:47AM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
Hum, honnestly I would *really* prefer to avoid systematically going though an RPC. No I don't like this idea, I prefer to keep the driver in libvirt linked in the user's space. Thibgs which were dirt cheap become way more expensive when they don't need to, this is a severe regression from a library user standpoint.
I'm not sure if the idea is completely wrong. I think possible advantage is that the libvirt will be pretty simple library and almost all development (on drivers) will be happen in the libvirtd.
And advantage maybe for the developper, but a definite regression for the user, and sorry the user has priority IMHO Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/