"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:50:57AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> wrote:
- networking: man, setting networking is a mess, libvirt just does it for you.
+1
Even when not using libvirt for a reason or another I usually hook my virtual machines into virbr0 (libvirt default network).
This is a war for another day :-)
I have that very same setup on my laptop. But I already use dnsmasq for other reasons -> no way to share dnsmasq with libvirt, libvirt want to use a different one -> have to configure two things, especially if I want specific names (in my dnsmasq setup already) for some of my guests.
FYI, the dnsmasq maintainer has actually volunteered todo some enhancements to dnsmasq to allow a prexisting instance of dnsmasq to play nicely with libvirt's needs. This should pretty much solve that problem
Great!!!!! /me reserves beer for him. Once there, making it to play well with selinux + dbus will make it just perfect :-) (I haven't checked if this worked in the last year, so ...) Later, Juan.