21 May
2010
21 May
'10
7:41 a.m.
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 16:55 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 13:32 -0700, Scott Feldman wrote:
On 5/20/10 1:10 PM, "Stefan Berger" <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
<vsi type='802.1Qbg'>
Can we use something more generic than <vsi></vsi> since VSI is a .bg term? Something like virtual_port?
Fine with me. How about <virtualport/>?
I made this change and the previously posted patch has of course changed quite a bit while getting rid of occurrences of vsi in variables and structure names in the code. Also part 2/3 of the [RFC] patch I posted needed to be adapted. Stefan
Stefam
-scott
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list