On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 03:59:38PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 24.06.2016 15:33, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 03:12:23PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> Currently, the daemon requires libvirt-admin.so because the
>> functions encoding/decoding RPC messages for admin APIs live
>> there. But this makes it very hard to split admin API into its
>> own separate package: if libvirt-admin.so is going to live in a
>> separate package than the daemon, either both packages must be
>> installed or none.
>> Solve this by statically linking the RPC message handling
>> functions with the daemon.
>
> I'm not sure I see any need for a separate package for libvirt-admin.so
> For libvirt-qemu.so and libvirt-lxc.so we keep them in libvirt-client
> RPM, and I'd expect libvirt-admin.so to be there too really.
So libvirt-client would contain not only virsh (and other .so files) but
virt-admin binary too? Okay, if that's what we want my patch is useless.
If we, however, want a separate package for libvirt-admin (which is kind
of special compared to libvirt-qemu.so and libvirt-lxc.so), then I guess
we need this patch.
Hmm, i guess libvirt-admin is only needed if libvirtd is actually
present on the host. So I guess we could argue that virt-admin
and libvirt-admin.so should just be a part of libvirt-daemon RPM.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|