On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 05:45:31AM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@gnome.org>
--- libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-os.c | 7 +++++++ libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-os.h | 1 + libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig.sym | 1 + 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-os.c b/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-os.c index 9a1648a..2e4a69a 100644 --- a/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-os.c +++ b/libvirt-gconfig/libvirt-gconfig-domain-os.c @@ -275,6 +275,13 @@ GList *gvir_config_domain_os_get_boot_devices(GVirConfigDomainOs *os) return devices; }
+const char *gvir_config_domain_os_get_arch(GVirConfigDomainOs *os) +{
g_return_val_if_fail(GVIR_CONFIG_IS_DOMAIN_OS(os), NULL); ACK with this added. Is it fine to return NULL when no arch is specified, or would it be better to return something else? Christophe