On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 12:52:16PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:48:43 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 11:39:57AM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 10:48:42 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > > # virsh blkdeviotune asdf hda
> > > error: Unable to get block I/O throttle parameters
> > > error: internal error block_io_throttle field 'total_bytes_sec'
missing in qemu's output
> >
> > I think the old/new error messages can be included directly in the commit
> > message. Anyway, I wonder if we should take this as an opportunity to fix the
> > "internal error", however I'm not sure what is the best code to
use. It seems
> > we use OPERATION_INVALID in such cases, which could be good enough.
>
> No, OPERATION_INVALID is for scenarios where the API request cannot
> be performed because the object is in the wrong state.
>
> eg when you request to pause a VM that is shutoff.
>
>
> This is a case where the data we receive back from QEMU is incorrect.
> I don't think we have a current error code that is suitable for this
> kind of scenario, so we ought to invent a new one.
>
> Some ideas
>
> MISSING_DATA
> DATA_INVALID
> UNEXPECTED_DATA
> ...insert others...
>
> my favour is probably DATA_INVALID
The data is actually correct, just the fields required for this functionality
are missing because QEMU is too old to support them. Perhaps
OPERATION_UNSUPPORTED (which doesn't currently exist either) could be the
right choice.
We do have a VIR_ERR_NO_SUPPORT, but its probably wise to restrict that
to only the case where the public API is not provided by the current
driver. So agree that a new OPERATION_UNSUPPORTED would be reasonable
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|