On 07/28/2017 12:59 PM, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:38:56PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
> Instead of making virObjectLock be the entry point for two
> different types of locks, let's create a virObjectLockWrite API
> which will be able to return status and force the (new) consumers
> of the RWLock to make sure the lock is really obtained when the
> "right" object type is passed.
If you remove the return value for the same reason as in the first patch
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina(a)redhat.com>
Fine again, minority opinion it seems. Still rename from
virObjectLockWrite to virObjectRWLockWrite is expect, right (or is that
Write)
John