On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:29:10AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 09.08.2013 18:29, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:58:55AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> writes:
[CC'ing qemu-devel list] On 09.08.2013 15:17, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 07:13:58AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/09/2013 06:56 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
So what's the conclusion? Should I push the patch until qemu gets stabilized in mem consumption (which can take a while - no offense to qemu devels, I can imagine it's nontrivial).
Given the lack of any useful info to make memory limits work reliably, I guess we don't have any choice but to remove this default memory limit, and also recommend against people setting explicit memory limits too. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|