On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 07:06:46AM -0400, Mark Wagner wrote:
On 05/19/2011 03:34 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
Hi Mark,
I think that maybe I didn't fully understand the entire context.
Well I wasn't sure either if the problem was lack of expressivity or some problem in the syntax :-)
My main goal is to make sure that we consider the differences between NUMA and simple CPU pinning. After a rereading the threads and some conversations it appears that you are doing that.
Ah, good, hopefully you will be able to fully check the result soon
Sorry for the noise on this issue
Well I prefer a bit of noise and making sure things are implemented fully than pushing ode that would not be adequate, so no problem ! :-)
btw - I must say that I think that the libvirt team is doing a great job overall in getting support for the features that are needed to achieve good to top performance from KVM. I actually based a lot of my Summit presentation around using libvirt and virt-manager. Once NUMA support is in, I expect that we will see some SPECvirt submissions that are based on libvirt. Thanks for all of the hard work!
Thanks for the kind words, hopefully we will be able to get all of the results using libvirt soon :-) Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/