On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:49:59PM +0800, wang.yi59(a)zte.com.cn wrote:
Hi Jano,
thanks for your reply.
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 04:40:16PM +0800, Yi Wang wrote:
[...]
> >diff --git a/src/qemu/libvirtd_qemu.aug
b/src/qemu/libvirtd_qemu.aug
> >index ddc4bbf..f7287ae 100644
> >--- a/src/qemu/libvirtd_qemu.aug
> >+++ b/src/qemu/libvirtd_qemu.aug
> >@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ module Libvirtd_qemu =
> > | limits_entry "max_core"
> > | bool_entry "dump_guest_core"
> > | str_entry "stdio_handler"
> >+ | int_entry "state_lock_timeout"
> >
>
> here you add the option at the end of the 'process_entry' group
>
> > let device_entry = bool_entry "mac_filter"
> > | bool_entry "relaxed_acs_check"
> >diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu.conf b/src/qemu/qemu.conf
> >index cd57b3c..8920a1a 100644
> >--- a/src/qemu/qemu.conf
> >+++ b/src/qemu/qemu.conf
> >@@ -667,6 +667,16 @@
> > #
> > #max_queued = 0
> >
> >+
> >+# When two or more threads want to work with the same domain they use a
> >+# job lock to mutually exclude each other. However, waiting for the lock
> >+# is limited up to state_lock_timeout seconds.
> >+# NB, strong recommendation to set the timeout longer than 30 seconds.
> >+#
> >+# Default is 30
> >+#
> >+#state_lock_timeout = 60
>
> But here in qemu.conf, you add it between the rpc entries.
>
> It seems we did not follow the structure with 'stdio_handler',
> but adding it either right after 'dump_guest_core' or at the end of file
> would be better than squeezing it between rpc entries.
As Michal suggested in:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-August/msg01693.html
max_queued and state_lock_timeout both refer to the same area, so I put it
here :)
My point was that the position in qemu.conf does not match the grouping
in libvirtd_qemu.aug
So if it's related to max_queued, it should also be in the rpc_entry group
in the aug file.
Jano