Hey,
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:55:51PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 07.09.2012 14:47, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:44:03PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 01:24:35PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> A nice long detailed explanation. I agree that this scenario you
>>> outline is plausible as an explanation for why Boxes sometimes
>>> stops getting events from libvirtd.
>>
>> I've ran more tests in the mean time without this patch applied, but
>> with the one below to add some debugging:
>>
>> diff --git a/src/conf/domain_event.c b/src/conf/domain_event.c
>> index 43ecdcf..33d90fb 100644
>> --- a/src/conf/domain_event.c
>> +++ b/src/conf/domain_event.c
>> @@ -1501,7 +1501,13 @@ virDomainEventStateRegisterID(virConnectPtr conn,
>> int ret = -1;
>>
>> virDomainEventStateLock(state);
>> + VIR_WARN("RegisterID");
[1]
>>
>> + if ((state->callbacks->count == 0) && (state->timer ==
-1)) {
>> + if (state->queue->count != 0) {
>> + VIR_WARN("REG: queue's not empty: %d",
state->queue->count);
I understand the WARN level here but not in [1]. Isn't DEBUG just enough
there?
Oh this was just a debug patch, I'm not proposing it for inclusion, hence
the WARN so that the logs I'm interested in jump to my face during the
debugging ;)
Christophe