On 16.09.2011 16:53, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 08:35:15AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 09/16/2011 03:51 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> If a domain has inactive XML we want to transfer it to destination
>> when migrating with VIR_MIGRATE_PERSIST_DEST. In order to harm
>> the migration protocol as least as possible, a optional cookie was
>> chosen.
>> ---
>> diff to v2:
>> -Fix substitution on wrong place
>> src/qemu/qemu_migration.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Looks right to me, but I'd feel more comfortable with a second ACK
> from danpb. I'm also hesitant on whether we should apply this now,
> or wait to post-0.9.5. While it is fixing a design flaw, it is not
> a regression fix, and feels more like a feature addition - if Dan
> could run this through his TCK suite to ensure no migration
> regressions, I'd feel a bit better about taking it now.
I tend to agree. The code looks reasonable, but I think we should wait
till post 0.9.5, to give more time for testing. In particular the
interoperability beteen different versions of libvirt when doing the
migration
Daniel
Okay. Fair enough. Dan, if you'll have time and run it through your TCK,
that would be great.
I'll hold on pushing this untill 0.9.5 is released.
Michal