On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:28:08 +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:06:08 +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 19:37:04 +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > Move the code from qemuBuildCommandLine into dedicated functions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar(a)redhat.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Notes:
> > Both functions will later be moved to qemu_migration.c
> >
> > src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 75
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
> > index 792ada3..723609d 100644
> > --- a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
> > +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
> > @@ -11006,32 +11045,20 @@ qemuBuildCommandLine(virConnectPtr conn,
> > }
> >
> > if (migrateFrom) {
> > - virCommandAddArg(cmd, "-incoming");
> > - if (STRPREFIX(migrateFrom, "tcp")) {
> > - virCommandAddArg(cmd, migrateFrom);
> > - } else if (STRPREFIX(migrateFrom, "rdma")) {
> > - if (!virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_MIGRATE_RDMA)) {
> > - virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_UNSUPPORTED, "%s",
> > - _("incoming RDMA migration is not
supported "
> > - "with this QEMU binary"));
> > - goto error;
> > - }
> > - virCommandAddArg(cmd, migrateFrom);
> > - } else if (STREQ(migrateFrom, "stdio")) {
> > - virCommandAddArgFormat(cmd, "fd:%d", migrateFd);
> > - virCommandPassFD(cmd, migrateFd, 0);
> > - } else if (STRPREFIX(migrateFrom, "exec")) {
> > - virCommandAddArg(cmd, migrateFrom);
> > - } else if (STRPREFIX(migrateFrom, "fd")) {
> > - virCommandAddArg(cmd, migrateFrom);
> > + char *migrateURI;
> > +
> > + if (qemuBuildIncomingCheckProtocol(qemuCaps, migrateFrom) < 0)
> > + goto error;
> > +
> > + if (STREQ(migrateFrom, "stdio") &&
> > + STRPREFIX(migrateFrom, "fd"))
>
> I doubt that this will ever be true.
Oops, looks like a wrong rebase after Daniel's removal of old migration
features. The following patch removes this completely, which is why I
didn't catch it during testing :-)
I'm now going through that patch and indeed it's being removed and the
condition sanitized. ACK to this one if you change && to ||.
Peter