On 16.04.2012 13:58, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 04/13/2012 09:14 AM, Stefan Bader wrote:
>> I think it would be better if we just centralized this logic, as in,
>> only set that (type ioemu) bit in conditional rather than 2. Should
>> be pretty straightforward.
>
> Did you have something like below in mind?
>
> -Stefan
>
> >From a0e214fa6dea9bd66616f37246067a2c631f4184 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader(a)canonical.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:32:41 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] libvirt: xen: do not use ioemu type for any emulated NIC
>
> When using the xm/xend stack to manage instances there is a bug
> that causes the emulated interfaces to be unusable when the vif
> config contains type=ioemu.
>
> The current code already has a special quirk to not use this
> keyword if no specific model is given for the emulated NIC
> (defaulting to rtl8139).
> Essentially it works because regardless of the type argument,i
> the Xen stack always creates emulated and paravirt interfaces and
> lets the guest decide which one to use. So neither xl nor xm stack
> actually require the type keyword for emulated NICs.
>
> [v2: move code around to have the exception in one case together]
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader(a)canonical.com>
> ---
> src/xenxs/xen_sxpr.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
> src/xenxs/xen_xm.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/xenxs/xen_sxpr.c b/src/xenxs/xen_sxpr.c
> index e1bbd76..3a56345 100644
> --- a/src/xenxs/xen_sxpr.c
> +++ b/src/xenxs/xen_sxpr.c
> @@ -1999,20 +1999,22 @@ xenFormatSxprNet(virConnectPtr conn,
> if (def->model != NULL)
> virBufferEscapeSexpr(buf, "(model '%s')",
def->model);
> }
> - else if (def->model == NULL) {
> - /*
> - * apparently (type ioemu) breaks paravirt drivers on HVM so skip
> - * this from XEND_CONFIG_MAX_VERS_NET_TYPE_IOEMU
> - */
> - if (xendConfigVersion <= XEND_CONFIG_MAX_VERS_NET_TYPE_IOEMU)
> - virBufferAddLit(buf, "(type ioemu)");
> - }
> - else if (STREQ(def->model, "netfront")) {
> - virBufferAddLit(buf, "(type netfront)");
> - }
> else {
> - virBufferEscapeSexpr(buf, "(model '%s')", def->model);
> - virBufferAddLit(buf, "(type ioemu)");
> + if (def->model != NULL && STREQ(def->model,
"netfront")) {
> + virBufferAddLit(buf, "(type netfront)");
> + }
> + else {
> + if (def->model != NULL) {
> + virBufferEscapeSexpr(buf, "(model '%s')",
def->model);
> + }
> + /*
> + * apparently (type ioemu) breaks paravirt drivers on HVM so skip
> + * this from XEND_CONFIG_MAX_VERS_NET_TYPE_IOEMU
> + */
> + if (xendConfigVersion <= XEND_CONFIG_MAX_VERS_NET_TYPE_IOEMU) {
> + virBufferAddLit(buf, "(type ioemu)");
> + }
> + }
> }
>
> if (!isAttach)
> diff --git a/src/xenxs/xen_xm.c b/src/xenxs/xen_xm.c
> index d65e97a..93a26f9 100644
> --- a/src/xenxs/xen_xm.c
> +++ b/src/xenxs/xen_xm.c
> @@ -1381,20 +1381,21 @@ static int xenFormatXMNet(virConnectPtr conn,
> if (net->model != NULL)
> virBufferAsprintf(&buf, ",model=%s", net->model);
> }
> - else if (net->model == NULL) {
> - /*
> - * apparently type ioemu breaks paravirt drivers on HVM so skip this
> - * from XEND_CONFIG_MAX_VERS_NET_TYPE_IOEMU
> - */
> - if (xendConfigVersion <= XEND_CONFIG_MAX_VERS_NET_TYPE_IOEMU)
> - virBufferAddLit(&buf, ",type=ioemu");
> - }
> - else if (STREQ(net->model, "netfront")) {
> - virBufferAddLit(&buf, ",type=netfront");
> - }
> else {
> - virBufferAsprintf(&buf, ",model=%s", net->model);
> - virBufferAddLit(&buf, ",type=ioemu");
> + if (net->model != NULL && STREQ(net->model,
"netfront")) {
> + virBufferAddLit(&buf, ",type=netfront");
> + }
> + else {
> + if (net->model != NULL)
> + virBufferAsprintf(&buf, ",model=%s", net->model);
> +
> + /*
> + * apparently type ioemu breaks paravirt drivers on HVM so skip this
> + * from XEND_CONFIG_MAX_VERS_NET_TYPE_IOEMU
> + */
> + if (xendConfigVersion <= XEND_CONFIG_MAX_VERS_NET_TYPE_IOEMU)
> + virBufferAddLit(&buf, ",type=ioemu");
> + }
> }
>
> if (net->ifname)
Looks good. Did you verify 'make check' passes as well?
If so, ACK
No :( And it fails.
TEST: libvirtdconftest
.....!!!!!!...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 37 FAIL
FAIL: libvirtdconftest
I guess this is expected as the change really does modify the generated configs.
So I need to find out how to make it expect that...
- Cole