On 05/17/2010 11:40 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/17/2010 11:22 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> This addresses another coverity-spotted "flaw".
>> However, since "cgroup" is never NULL after that initial "if"
stmt,
>> the only penalty is that the useless cleanup test would make a reviewer
>> try to figure out how cgroup could be NULL there.
>
> ACK.
Thanks.
>> cleanup:
>> - if (cgroup)
>> - virCgroupFree(&cgroup);
>> + virCgroupFree(&cgroup);
Hmm, on re-reading this, why is virCgroupFree taking a pointer to a
virCgroupPtr, then blindly dereferencing it throughout the cleanup? It
almost seems like we have the wrong signature, and should be using:
virCgroupFree(virCgroupPtr group)
instead of
virCgroupFree(virCgroupPtr *group)
and adjust all callers. But that's a separate cleanup.
This makes the useless-if-before-free test in maint.mk spot
uses of virCgroupFree just like it does for free and the other
listed functions.
* cfg.mk (useless_free_options): Add virCgroupFree.
Prompted by suggestion from Eric Blake.
ACK, given the current semantics of virCgroupFree.
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org