On 10/7/19 6:49 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
We mirror the labeling strategy that was used for its top image
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com> ---
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
src/security/security_selinux.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/security/security_selinux.c b/src/security/security_selinux.c index feb703d325..2a3b7fc10d 100644 --- a/src/security/security_selinux.c +++ b/src/security/security_selinux.c @@ -1844,7 +1844,7 @@ virSecuritySELinuxSetImageLabelInternal(virSecurityManagerPtr mgr, virSecurityDeviceLabelDefPtr parent_seclabel = NULL; char *use_label = NULL; bool remember; - bool is_toplevel = parent == src; + bool is_toplevel = parent == src || parent->externalDataStore == src; int ret;
if (!src->path || !virStorageSourceIsLocalStorage(src)) @@ -1931,6 +1931,14 @@ virSecuritySELinuxSetImageLabelRelative(virSecurityManagerPtr mgr, if (virSecuritySELinuxSetImageLabelInternal(mgr, def, n, parent) < 0) return -1;
+ if (n->externalDataStore && + virSecuritySELinuxSetImageLabelRelative(mgr, + def, + n->externalDataStore, + parent, + flags) < 0) + return -1; + if (!(flags & VIR_SECURITY_DOMAIN_IMAGE_LABEL_BACKING_CHAIN)) break; }