On 10/7/19 6:49 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
We mirror the labeling strategy that was used for its top image
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso(a)redhat.com>
---
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413(a)gmail.com>
src/security/security_selinux.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/security/security_selinux.c b/src/security/security_selinux.c
index feb703d325..2a3b7fc10d 100644
--- a/src/security/security_selinux.c
+++ b/src/security/security_selinux.c
@@ -1844,7 +1844,7 @@ virSecuritySELinuxSetImageLabelInternal(virSecurityManagerPtr mgr,
virSecurityDeviceLabelDefPtr parent_seclabel = NULL;
char *use_label = NULL;
bool remember;
- bool is_toplevel = parent == src;
+ bool is_toplevel = parent == src || parent->externalDataStore == src;
int ret;
if (!src->path || !virStorageSourceIsLocalStorage(src))
@@ -1931,6 +1931,14 @@ virSecuritySELinuxSetImageLabelRelative(virSecurityManagerPtr
mgr,
if (virSecuritySELinuxSetImageLabelInternal(mgr, def, n, parent) < 0)
return -1;
+ if (n->externalDataStore &&
+ virSecuritySELinuxSetImageLabelRelative(mgr,
+ def,
+ n->externalDataStore,
+ parent,
+ flags) < 0)
+ return -1;
+
if (!(flags & VIR_SECURITY_DOMAIN_IMAGE_LABEL_BACKING_CHAIN))
break;
}