On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 17:18:33 -0400
Corey Bryant <coreyb(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
On 08/08/2012 05:13 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 16:52:41 -0400
> Corey Bryant <coreyb(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 08/08/2012 04:48 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>> On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 15:07:02 -0400
>>> Corey Bryant <coreyb(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 08/07/2012 06:16 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>>>> On 08/07/2012 11:07 AM, Corey Bryant wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +#
>>>>>>>> +# Since: 1.2.0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We're not very consistent on '1.2' vs.
'1.2.0' in since listings, but
>>>>>>> that's probably worth a global cleanup closer to hard
freeze.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll make a note of it. Or does Luiz usually do a cleanup?
>>>>>
>>>>> No idea.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Luiz, were you planning to take a pass at cleaning up the
"since"
>>>> release? If not let me know and I can submit a patch. Just let me
know
>>>> which to use, '1.2' or '1.2.0'.
>>>
>>> I'd appreciate it if you submit a patch. I guess we should use 1.2.0.
>>>
>>
>> Sure I'll do that.
>>
>> Btw, should I be using error_set(errp, ERROR_CLASS_GENERIC_ERROR,
"...")
>> and have a dependency on your patch series? Or should I stick with the
>> old error messages?
>
> That would preferable, yes. Specially if you're adding new errors.
>
> But I'm not exactly sure when my series will be merged, this depends on
> what review will bring.
>
Are you planning on getting in QEMU 1.2?
Absolutely.