On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 08:11:20AM -0600, Mike Latimer wrote:
On Friday, March 28, 2014 12:28:43 PM Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 04:12:16PM -0600, Mike Latimer wrote:
> > Move the test for /usr/sbin/lldptool up so libvirt-tck will report the
> > skip
> > and reason, rather than passing the test as 'ok'.
>
> So we're talking about the difference between the test
> indicating "OK 3 out of 3 tests skipped" vs "SKIPPED" ?
> If so, that sounds like a nice improvement
Yes, but the real reason for the change is when you are running the full
libvirt-tck suite. This patch changes the following output:
.../230-no-mac-broadcast.t .............. ok
.../240-no-arp-spoofing.t ............... ok
.../300-vsitype.t ....................... ok
.../100-disk-encryption.t ................... ok
.../200-qcow2-single-backing-file.t ......... ok
To this:
.../230-no-mac-broadcast.t .............. ok
.../240-no-arp-spoofing.t ............... ok
.../300-vsitype.t ....................... skipped: lldptool is not available
.../100-disk-encryption.t ................... ok
.../200-qcow2-single-backing-file.t ......... ok
Yep. that makes sense. Will push this, and rebase mine change on
top of it.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|