Andrea Bolognani <abologna(a)redhat.com> [2018-08-16, 04:44PM +0200]:
On Tue, 2018-08-07 at 17:10 +0800, Yi Min Zhao wrote:
[...]
> +qemuDomainDeviceSupportZPCI(virDomainDeviceDefPtr device)
> +{
> + switch ((virDomainDeviceType) device->type) {
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_CHR:
> + return false;
> +
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_CONTROLLER:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_DISK:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_LEASE:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_FS:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_NET:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_INPUT:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_SOUND:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_VIDEO:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_HOSTDEV:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_WATCHDOG:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_GRAPHICS:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_HUB:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_REDIRDEV:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_SMARTCARD:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_MEMBALLOON:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_NVRAM:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_RNG:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_SHMEM:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_TPM:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_PANIC:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_MEMORY:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_IOMMU:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_VSOCK:
> + break;
> +
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_NONE:
> + case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_LAST:
Missing 'default' case.
I thought we explicitly don't want a default case so that the compiler
can catch this is another enum entry is added?