On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 09:39:44AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 01:47:09PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Here's a patch which should address all concerns raised, although I
> left the VIR_MEMORY_VIRTUAL flag because I still think it's important
> to have it.
>
> Please note to whomever is maintaining libvirt in Fedora that there is
> a change to the specfile.
Any comments on this patch?
Looks ok to me now.
Daniel.
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://ovirt.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|