On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 09:39:44AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 01:47:09PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Here's a patch which should address all concerns raised, although I left the VIR_MEMORY_VIRTUAL flag because I still think it's important to have it.
Please note to whomever is maintaining libvirt in Fedora that there is a change to the specfile.
Any comments on this patch?
Looks ok to me now. Daniel. -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|