On 12/07/2011 11:41 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
From: Michael Ellerman <michael(a)ellerman.id.au>
Add logic to assign addresses for devices with spapr-vio addresses.
We also do validation of addresses specified by the user, ie. ensuring
that there are not duplicate addresses on the bus.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael(a)ellerman.id.au>
---
src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Depends on patch 4, but I'll review anyway...
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
index 32ee8d8..62a1258 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c
@@ -684,6 +684,87 @@ qemuAssignDeviceAliases(virDomainDefPtr def, virBitmapPtr qemuCaps)
return -1;
}
+static int
+qemuSpaprVIOFindByReg(virDomainDefPtr def ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+ virDomainDeviceInfoPtr info, void *opaque)
+{
+ virDomainDeviceInfoPtr target = (virDomainDeviceInfoPtr)opaque;
The cast isn't strictly necessary in C.
+
+ if (info->type != VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_SPAPRVIO)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Match a dev that has a reg, is not us, and has a matching reg */
+ if (info->addr.spaprvio.has_reg && info != target &&
As I asked in 4, can a valid reg ever be 0, or must it be non-zero? If
the latter, then you don't need has_reg.
+ info->addr.spaprvio.reg == target->addr.spaprvio.reg)
+ /* Has to be < 0 so virDomainDeviceInfoIterate() will exit */
+ return -1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+qemuAssignSpaprVIOAddress(virDomainDefPtr def, virDomainDeviceInfoPtr info,
+ unsigned long long default_reg)
+{
+ bool user_reg;
+ int rc;
+
+ if (info->type != VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_SPAPRVIO)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Check if the user has assigned the reg already, if so use it */
+ user_reg = info->addr.spaprvio.has_reg;
+ if (!user_reg) {
+ info->addr.spaprvio.reg = default_reg;
+ info->addr.spaprvio.has_reg = true;
+ }
+
+ rc = virDomainDeviceInfoIterate(def, qemuSpaprVIOFindByReg, info);
+ while (rc != 0) {
+ if (user_reg) {
+ qemuReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR,
+ _("spapr-vio address %#llx already in use"),
+ info->addr.spaprvio.reg);
+ return -EEXIST;
+ }
+
+ /* We assigned the reg, so try a new value */
+ info->addr.spaprvio.reg += 0x1000;
+ rc = virDomainDeviceInfoIterate(def, qemuSpaprVIOFindByReg, info);
+ }
Looks reasonable at either honoring the user's choice, or at iterating
by 0x1000 until a free slot is found. Does that match the qemu algorithm?
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int qemuDomainAssignSpaprVIOAddresses(virDomainDefPtr def)
+{
+ int i, rc;
+
+ for (i = 0 ; i < def->nnets; i++) {
+ rc = qemuAssignSpaprVIOAddress(def, &def->nets[i]->info,
+ 0x1000ul);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0 ; i < def->ncontrollers; i++) {
+ rc = qemuAssignSpaprVIOAddress(def, &def->controllers[i]->info,
+ 0x2000ul);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0 ; i < def->nserials; i++) {
+ rc = qemuAssignSpaprVIOAddress(def, &def->serials[i]->info,
+ 0x30000000ul);
Again, I assume these three defaults match qemu.
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org