On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 11:09:41PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 11:04:48PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 09:31:50PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
>>The commit summary speaks of moving checks, but the commit actually
>>relaxes them. I would not expect functional changes from that message.
>>
>>How about:
>>qemu: relax and move SMM checks to validation phase
>>
>
>Here you suggest changing the commit message to describe both changes.
>
>>On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 10:37:40AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>>We are still hoping all of such checks will be moved there and this is one
small
>>>step in that direction.
>>>
>>>One of the things that this is improving is the fact that instead of error
>>>message *that was wrong) you get when starting a domain with SMM and i440fx
we
>>
>>(that was wrong)
>>
>>>allow the setting to go through. SMM option exists and makes sense on i440fx
as
>>>well (basically whenever that _SMM_OPT capability is set).
>>>
>>>Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com>
>>>---
>>> src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 11 -----------
>>> src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h | 3 ---
>>> src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 12 ++----------
>>> src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>>> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>>With the commit summary adjusted or changes split in two:
^^ DUH!!!
>>
>
>Here you are suggesting to split it into two. I'm fine with both, just tell me
>what you meant so I can fix it up, thanks.
Summary adjusted OR changes split, IOW: don't leave functional changes
in the commit named 'Move'
Of course, the split is nicer.
Of course, will do that.