On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 01:38:50PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 11:12 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:53:53AM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
While RHEL / CentOS are still using Python 2 for the time being, Fedora has already switched to Python 3 as the default Python interpreter a while ago, so on that OS it doesn't make sense to drag in Python 2 anymore.
While current RHEL are py2, future RHEL should be expected to use Python 3 too
[...]
+# Fedora can use Python 3, which unlike Python 2 is installed by default +%if 0%{?fedora}
This should include "|| 0%{?rhel} > 7" too
I think we should cross that bridge when we come to it, eg. when a RHEL release that uses Python 3 as the default Python is released.
We're probably going to have to go through the spec file and reassess most package relationships at that point anyway.
We've already crossed the bridge & done this work commit b2ab38bfdc765bbcb56b89b55dfee6b406fc8c29 Author: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Date: Fri Feb 9 14:08:45 2018 +0100 spec: Prepare for future RHEL Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|