s/raneming/renaming/
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 02:42:59PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
On 06/22/2016 11:48 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> It may cause unwanted behaviour (of course, is there any wanted one for
> that case?) so we should rather disable the possibility of doing so.
>
> Resolves:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320893
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/libvirt-domain.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/libvirt-domain.c b/src/libvirt-domain.c
> index 508520efd6c5..89a2d7efe972 100644
> --- a/src/libvirt-domain.c
> +++ b/src/libvirt-domain.c
> @@ -8790,7 +8790,7 @@ virDomainRename(virDomainPtr dom,
>
> virResetLastError();
> virCheckDomainReturn(dom, -1);
> - virCheckNonNullArgGoto(new_name, error);
> + virCheckNonEmptyStringArgGoto(new_name, error);
Shouldn't both be required? EG We don't want NULL or "" for new_name,
right?
virCheckNonEmptyStringArgGoto also checks for NULL, so ACK with the typo
fixed.
Jan
The comments should at least indicate @new_name cannot be NULL or
empty
string.
Although it seems remoteDomainRename could pass along a NULL that it
doesn't seem virDomainObjListRename would be very happy to STREQ against.
ACK as long as the NonNullArg is replaced...
John