On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 04:22:33PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 03:39:51PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right way to solve this, but it is a way.
we should test the return value to check for an error there, the unfortunate thing is that since we are in a signal handler there isn't much we can do, I suggest to increment a global variable (which could for example be checked if we hit that problem by some other code in the main loop). Other ideas ?
How about this patch. It implements your suggestion.
yup, better than I would have done myself (didn't knew there was a specific type sig_atomic_t for atomic access...). Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/