17 May
2010
17 May
'10
4:24 p.m.
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 14:05 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/17/2010 12:09 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
+{ + virBitmap bit = bitmap[VIR_BITMAP_UNIT_OFFSET(b)] & + (1 << VIR_BITMAP_BIT_OFFSET(b));
Should these interfaces add sanity checks that b is in range (that is, smaller than the original allocated size)? Do we want to support dynamically-growing bitsets?
Right, should hold the number of elements it has. I think range checking would be a good idea. Stefan