Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/4] Add VCPU halted to domain statistics
On 10/24/2016 11:24 AM, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
On 24.10.2016 16:29, John Ferlan wrote:
[...]
>
> The series looks good to me - do you think it's worthwhile to mention
> anywhere in virsh.pod that the "halted" could mean "really
halted" or
> "not scheduled" or "not actively processing" depending on
architecture?
> (and how best to say it).
As the other values' documentation is quite terse, I was tempted to stay
in style by being brief as well. Maybe something along the lines of:
... halted: yes or no (may indicate the processor is idle or even
disabled, depending on the architecture).
Perfect - I went with that.
>
> I can tweak virsh.pod before pushing based on your or others
> feedback/thoughts.
>
Surely no objections from my side.
[...]
Now pushed
John