It makes sense to accept pvpanic-pci also without specified PCI
address and assign one if possible.
Resolves:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961326
Signed-off-by: Kristina Hanicova <khanicov(a)redhat.com>
---
src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c b/src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c
index 20b648354b..2023f283d6 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c
@@ -1062,10 +1062,24 @@ qemuDomainDeviceCalculatePCIConnectFlags(virDomainDeviceDef *dev,
}
break;
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_PANIC:
+ switch ((virDomainPanicModel) dev->data.panic->model) {
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_PANIC_MODEL_PVPANIC:
+ return pciFlags | VIR_PCI_CONNECT_INTEGRATED;
+
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_PANIC_MODEL_DEFAULT:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_PANIC_MODEL_ISA:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_PANIC_MODEL_PSERIES:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_PANIC_MODEL_HYPERV:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_PANIC_MODEL_S390:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_PANIC_MODEL_LAST:
+ return 0;
+ }
+ break;
+
/* These devices don't ever connect with PCI */
case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_NVRAM:
case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_TPM:
- case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_PANIC:
case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_HUB:
case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_REDIRDEV:
case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_SMARTCARD:
@@ -2454,6 +2468,24 @@ qemuDomainAssignDevicePCISlots(virDomainDef *def,
return -1;
}
+ for (i = 0; i < def->npanics; i++) {
+ virDomainPanicDef *panic = def->panics[i];
+
+ switch (panic->model) {
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_PANIC_MODEL_PVPANIC:
+ if (virDeviceInfoPCIAddressIsWanted(&panic->info) &&
+ qemuDomainPCIAddressReserveNextAddr(addrs, &panic->info) < 0)
+ return -1;
+ break;
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_PANIC_MODEL_DEFAULT:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_PANIC_MODEL_ISA:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_PANIC_MODEL_PSERIES:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_PANIC_MODEL_HYPERV:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_PANIC_MODEL_S390:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_PANIC_MODEL_LAST:
+ break;
+ }
+ }
return 0;
}
--
2.39.1